'libxul' naming

Christopher Blizzard blizzard at mozilla.org
Fri, 03 Dec 2004 11:36:38 -0500


Robert O'Callahan wrote:
> 
> Sounds reasonable, but by those reasons libxul is even worse than 
> libgecko for the audience of HTML embedders.
> 
> How about something based on "Mozilla", e.g. libmoz or libmozilla? (I 
> hear Ben's comment about Windows developers and the lib- prefix, but I 
> can't think of a better affix. ActiveGecko!)
> 
> Rob
> 

Is it time for mozilla.dll?  I think it might be.  :)

--Chris